Another tonewood article...

Started by Dale_I, October 23, 2009, 04:55:11 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

For your reading pleasure, this was originally published in American Lutherie #69 and has been posted online with permission.

http://www.guitarnation.com/articles/calkin.htm
"The barrier to knowledge is the belief that you have it"

2006 Larrivee LV-10 MR   1980 Les Paul Custom Natural   2008 Larrivee LV-03-12   1998 Carvin LB75 Koa Bass

I question the premise of the article and a number of statements the author makes.

The concept of tonewood is a hoax. Of the few things that we can do to a guitar and still call it a guitar, changing the wood it is made of will have the least impact upon the quality of the sound that it produces. The tonal difference between a mahogany guitar and a rosewood guitar is exactly the same as the difference between two mahogany guitars or two rosewood guitars.

At a gathering of players 4-5 years ago, Tim McKnight brought a set of a dozen pieces of different tone woods, both side woods and top woods. you were blindfolded and then asked to identify which wood was which from a tap test. I was able to get about 7 or 8 of them correctly, which was about average, a few people got them almost/or 100% correct (mostly people who had worked as luthiers or repair people).

I do agree with the statement: The tone of a guitar lies more in the hands of the builder than in the materials from which it is constructed.

Its a good article and worthwhile reading. Thanks for posting.
Randy R., Georgia, USA
Opinions available. Inquire about qty discount.
Forum Guitar III LS03 #15 ser no 108519

   I have to disagree from the differences I hear in Maple,hog and RW. At least the ones I have had.

Like a chef saying there is not much difference between sugar and salt. Some chef.
L-03 Italian Spruce

Quote from: hadden on October 23, 2009, 07:14:49 PM
Like a chef saying there is not much difference between sugar and salt. Some chef.
Or cinnamon and peppermint.

Thanks for the disgreements - I find significant differences between tone woods.  Both the soundboard and back/side woods **do** make a difference, as does the bracing pattern. Otherwise, all guitars would sound the same...and they do not.

Dave
2001 McIlroy A30 #75, Spruce/Rosewood
Martin OM-15M, all mahogany
Paddy Burgin Bouzouki, Redwood over Claro Walnut
Keith Newell mandolin, Spruce over Claro Walnut
1916 Gibson A mandolin
1927 Langestyle tenor banjo

I disagree with statements made in the article, and agree with others. However, I thought I might offer it up since I found it.

Remember... don't shoot the messenger!!!
"The barrier to knowledge is the belief that you have it"

2006 Larrivee LV-10 MR   1980 Les Paul Custom Natural   2008 Larrivee LV-03-12   1998 Carvin LB75 Koa Bass

Ya don't shoot......................................Throw donuts at him......................................................... :donut2 :donut2 :donut2 :donut2 :donut :donut :donut :donut :donut2 :donut2 :donut2


















:wave
A REPAIRPERSON,Barefoot Rob gone to a better place
OM03PA
Favorite saying
 OB LA DE OB LA DA,LIFE GOES ON---BRA,It is what it is,You just gotta deal it,
One By One The Penguins Steal My Sanity, Keith and Barefoot Rob on youtube
Still unclrob
#19
12 people ignoring me,so cool
rpjguitarworks
Call PM me I may be able to help

Sorry ...but all tonewoods each have a distinct tonal influence.  In fact every " Solid " has a very distinct analogue frequency.   That coupled with its molecular and physical density allows each to project a very distinct tone.

I must disagree 150% with the statement in this article!


Cheers!


Bubblemaker!

Powered by EzPortal