Matthew Larrivee Alamo music interview

[William2]

I listened to both interviews.  Very informative, particularly the (brief) history of Mr Larrivee (the elder and original) and his life.  Sounds like he had a rough start but made it through with hard work and determination.  I personally would enjoy learning more about that.  It must be an amazing life story. 

Maybe it was just Matthew's choice of words or just his conversational style, but it sounds like it's now his shop and he's running it and making decisions? ("The woods I choose, how I wind pickups, one of my designs," etc)  What role does Mr Larrivee still play?  As well as John Larrivee? etc.  Is it still a family-run company or has it become Matthew Larrivee Guitars?

It would be interesting if Mr. Larrivee were to write a biography especially since this will be a generational run business.

[Silence Dogood]

It would be interesting if Mr. Larrivee were to write a biography...

I'd be one of the first in line for that book.  I know Bob Taylor wrote a book some years ago but I've never read it. I doubt there are a lot of publishers knocking on doors for books from guitar-makers, but even something self-published and available in the Larrivee store would be great for those who know (or want to know more!). 

[Gill]

I'd be one of the first in line for that book.  I know Bob Taylor wrote a book some years ago but I've never read it. I doubt there are a lot of publishers knocking on doors for books from guitar-makers, but even something self-published and available in the Larrivee store would be great for those who know (or want to know more!). 

I agree, just listening to M L's brief outline of his Dads early life would be a very interesting read in itself,and of course,the story of how it all got going for him from his first experiences as an apprentice luthier,fascinating stuff to any Larrivee guitar fan surely.

[BlueBowman]

Thanks for posting these interviews. I watched both videos. Matt covers lots of interesting ground from the factory builder's perspective. But the one thing that really jumped out at me was his response to "voicing" guitars. He says he prefers a proven formula over individual voicing. I've read a lot about this process, and I think I've come to the conclusion that there probably really is lot of "mumbo jumbo" (Matt's words) in this process.* Go read William Cumpiano's blog on his thoughts. He thinks most makers are fooling themselves with the voicing process, himself preferring the term "minimum adequate structure" instead. He's a veteran builder and even wrote one of the first definitive books on guitar building.

Lightening the guitar in the right places will indeed make a guitar louder and bassier. Better? That's up to the individual. I know SCGC, for example, tunes their tops and backs to specific pitches. Best I can tell is they tune them a musical third apart from each other, and doing so will result in a different sound. Better? I like it, but I've also played guitars that weren't tuned in such a way, and they sound great as well. Maybe that's a kinda of voicing, I guess, but it still seems formulaic. Completely understandable in a factory setting. Incidentally, I also had a newer Taylor once that had its top and back tuned a musical third apart. I thought it sounded quite good.

Food for thought. It's great to hear guitar makers cover these topics. Well done, Matt.

*I've played too many great sounding guitars that were built to a formula to think that "voicing" is a must.

[B0WIE]

FWIW, SCGC doesn't shoot for specific pitches but a harmonious relationship between the nodes.

I'd have to personally disagree with Matt as I've found it can make all the difference in the world. But, we're also talking about a wildly different price range with base level Larrivees being less than 1/4 the cost of the least expensive SCGS. I personally think each company is the best at what they do, and absolutely worth their respective costs, but they're doing two different things, IMO.