Main Forums => Technique & Playing => Topic started by: dennq on May 10, 2005, 12:59:57 AM

Poll
Question: What is the average age of an acoustic guitar player?
Option 1: 16 or younger votes: 3
Option 2: 17 to 29 votes: 11
Option 3: 30 to 44 votes: 35
Option 4: 45 to 56 votes: 32
Option 5: 57 to 65 votes: 4
Option 6: 65 plus votes: 1
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dennq on May 10, 2005, 12:59:57 AM
Are acoustic players an older bunch or are they young and full of ambition. Well we shall see...
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: jeremy3220 on May 10, 2005, 01:27:58 AM
are you asking us to vote for our age. or vote as the question reads("What is the average age of an acoustic guitar player?")? :blink:  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dennq on May 10, 2005, 01:32:55 AM
I guess I have made it a two way street. What I was  meaning  to say is... as I age I am using my electric guitars less and my acoustics more.  Am I the norm.  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: jeremy3220 on May 10, 2005, 01:51:59 AM
if you want the poll to mean anything we need to know what we are voting for. you could have a bunch of 16 year olds voting for 65+, and whats that gonna tell you.? nothing.

Any way I think most serious acoustic players are older.Serious in the sense of  wasting our time on forums discussing tonewoods and bridge pins, or in other words Obsessed! although I am in the 17-29 range.
I bet if you were to poll U.S. and Canada you'd find that most people who play an acoustic guitar are under 25, which is why I made the destinction of serious players(players with sticktoittivness).
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Dan1954 on May 10, 2005, 09:01:45 AM
I'm 50
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: bhika on May 10, 2005, 09:07:10 AM
41 and starting to feel it.   :blink:  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: BW dreaming on May 10, 2005, 09:24:19 AM
It seems to me that there are a lot of acoustic guitar players in high school and college.  Then they graduate and life catches up with them.  If they were never really that good or never had a great time doing it, they'll fill up space with other things and the guitar playing fades away.  I know that's what happened to my dad.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: jimmyd on May 10, 2005, 10:04:20 AM
I'm old but I'm bald.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: wyodeb on May 10, 2005, 11:50:49 AM
42. Not bald. :lol:

Deb
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Fredmando on May 10, 2005, 12:32:04 PM
47 and still have the hair, but I can't play guitar!  :o My best friend is bald and plays a nasty lead and 12 string guitar. Is there a trade off I don't know about?
Where do I get in line if there is? I don't want to go on torturing my wife and dogs!
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: hcole on May 10, 2005, 12:41:45 PM
I'll be 25 in two weeks
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: brimc76 on May 10, 2005, 02:43:55 PM
I'll be 53 in 2 months.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: jimi thing on May 10, 2005, 02:51:37 PM
:huh:  recently turned thhhhh irrrtttt.....awe um 29 again! wooo hoo!

i still can't say that darn word....

i would agree with what has been said, i began playing in highschool, than didn't play while at college, then picked it up again, found other interests, and picked it up again 6 years ago.

kit



Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: sublro on May 10, 2005, 02:56:12 PM
Im not sure what the percentage of guitarists younger than 25 that play acoustic is, but I think it's a no-brainer that the older an active guitar player is, the more likely they are to have an acoustic in their hands.

Pretty simple -

acoustics are quieter (in terms of the spectrum of music that is typically played on them), and are viable solo instruments (which electrics, at least solid body, are not - Tuck Andross and Stanley Jordan notwithstanding  :) ).

These characteristics match well with the realities of typical post-single existence.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: kwakatak on May 10, 2005, 04:09:15 PM
I'm 35 and have pretty much been playing acoustic since I started - except the wild days of my teens and early 20s when I got one of those pointy super Strat thingies!  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: tiffer on May 10, 2005, 05:49:29 PM
Ok, so far looks like I may be the oldest here at present, 58 in two months.  Can't play worth a damn, still learning...but hey got all my hair. Maybe that counts for somthing :lol:

Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Randy_R on May 10, 2005, 06:23:14 PM
Did someone just ask what my average age was?  <_<  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: mazareth on May 10, 2005, 08:21:49 PM
Just turned 42 on 4/16. I've almost always had an electric around, but I play almost exclusively acoustic. I first learned to play sometime around 1985, with probably 10 years of actual playing time. I've probably advanced more as a player since setting the D-03R in September, than in all the years prior.

Regular gigs and open mics are a powerful motivator to learn new songs and improve my technique. Generally my fellow musicians are only one who notice... :P

Mark
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Denis on May 10, 2005, 09:12:35 PM
38, playing since I got my first guitar for Christmas in 1980, owned one electric for about 2-3 months and have had about 12 or so acoustics.  Too much hassle with electrics for me.  Plus you can't go sit under a tree or by a lake and watch the girls walk by with an electric.

Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dennq on May 11, 2005, 12:02:58 AM
I guess I should answer my own poll. I'm 44 now and have been playin' since I was 10.  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Fergy07 on May 11, 2005, 08:22:47 AM
Is this true for anyone else, I know for myself I used to play electric almost exclusively when I was younger and jamming more with friends or the stereo. As I got older (I'm also 44, but I didn't start until I was 16), I just got tired of a) having to deal with trying to get a decent sound out of the electrics, B) the whole amp and patch cords, etc, c) electrics just don't sound great unless cranked (well I did have Pete Townsend as a hero when I was younger), d) acoustics are so much easier to just grab and play as the mood strikes, and finally e) no one seems to really care if I play my acoustic, where as with the electrics I always felt I was intruding on other people as I practiced.

So for my perspective, I think most kids are electrified, most married with children types probably are a little more acoustic oriented.

Just my two cents,

Andy
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Jack R on May 11, 2005, 09:03:13 AM
62, bald, and can't play very well. Now that's a lose - lose situation.
But I have fun trying.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: sayheyjeff on May 11, 2005, 09:54:25 AM
53 and learnin.  practice with the energy I used to use to grow hair.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: C-10thunder on May 15, 2005, 04:29:20 PM
Just turned a half-century in March.
Can't wait to live out the next half-century!
Ron
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: bigfurrywhale on May 15, 2005, 05:00:29 PM
Hot Dog! I might be the youngest forum member at 16 years old :D I started when I was 13 i think, by buying an electric. I got my Om03r in october of last year and I play alot more acoustic than electric now. (90%-10% roughly) And I'm not looking back :).


PS I feel really awkward now  :blink:  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: wyodeb on May 15, 2005, 08:15:48 PM
QuotePS I feel really awkward now  :blink:
You'll grow out of it. ;)

Seriously, I wish I had started guitar at your age. I'd be so much better now. Better late than never I guess. Nice to have you in the forum!

Deb  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: bigfurrywhale on May 15, 2005, 09:34:57 PM
Great to be in the forum :) Nice to know I'm around "mature" folk ;)
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: GuitarGeek on May 15, 2005, 11:16:46 PM
I'm 22, been told I don't always act it though :P
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: MrZamboni on May 15, 2005, 11:57:51 PM
I'm 49 and have been playing since about 13. Started with a cheap laminate (real cheap), then moved to an electric 12 string but couldn't afford an amp, so back to acoustic and have been there ever since. I do own a Epi dot, but my son plays it most of the time (although his main guitar is a D02)
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: sgfletch on May 16, 2005, 03:54:56 AM
Kinda cool question, and like anybody - I guess I like to talk about myself.

I just turned 36.  Started playing guitar at age 10.  Played mostly electric until I was 19 and somebody loaned me a Bruce Cockburn cassette(waiting for a miracle - the compilation) and Van Morrson's "St. Dominic's Preview", and suddenly instead of wanting to be a hotshot lead guitar player - I suddenly wanted to be the guy with the acoustic writing and singing the songs.  That summer I put my electric in the closet, bought an acoustic, and threw away the flatpick for about a year.  Except for occasional overdubs on recordings, I really haven't played much electric since.  

I love electric guitar, I still get a charge out of old Rush and Deep Purple, I still love the angularity and freshness of Andy Summers and the Edge, the virtuosity of Steve Vai, the cool elegance of Grant Green or Wes Montgomery, and the complete beauty of Eric Johnson's electric playing.  To truly know myself, however, I know that has never really been my path.  Dylan's "it's allright ma, I'm only dying" or Paul Simon's "hearts and bones", or Graham Parker's "Live Alone in America", or David Wilcox's "How Did You Find Me Here?" - those records CHANGED MY LIFE!  I wanted to COMMUNICATE with an audience in an intimate way, to invite them "in" rather than blast away "at" them.  i DON'T THINK that that made me more mature than my peers, just different.  The acoustic guitar has always seemed like the natural vehicle for that.  It leaves a little more space for you as a singer, and as a player-it leaves a little more space between the notes, where the listener can fill in the rest.

I don't think it's all about age, just about what your particular reasons are for playing.  Yngwie and Pierre Bensusan serve the same master, it's just that one wears leather pants, you know?  

Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: fado on May 17, 2005, 12:49:40 PM
I'm 36 and I've been playing since I was 27. Always loved screaming electric guitars but fell in love with acoustic when I saw a buddy play some fingerstyle. Promptly took some lessons and haven't looked back since.

A year after taking lessons I purchased an LV09 and immediately fell in love with the acoustic guitar itself.

Rob

Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: unclrob on May 17, 2005, 01:30:10 PM
Soon to be 50.Started on acoustic when I was 11,played electric for 35 years but always had my trusty acoustic near by.Now I've come full circle and back to acoustic.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Fisherman on May 18, 2005, 05:05:58 PM
34  ;)  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: D4ve on May 18, 2005, 07:26:51 PM
Hey Don I see us old guys are catching up a bit?
<_<  :blink:
Must be the vitamins
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: PapaTom on May 19, 2005, 04:00:32 PM
I'm 59 in 3 months, don't play very well, still have hair and it's still mostly dark.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dbirchett on May 19, 2005, 05:00:33 PM
QuoteHey Don I see us old guys are catching up a bit?
<_<  :blink:
Must be the vitamins
Yay! Let's hear it for the old farts!  :D  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: MH3 on May 20, 2005, 11:12:35 PM
34 years old, with semi-gray hair that is only slightly receding.  I've been playing around with acoustics since about 1987.  I've never owned an electric, although I am contemplating buying one if I can ever sell my Guild and my Tak.  It does seem alot of rigamarole to deal with, though - guitar, amp, cords, maybe even effects - I may just find a nice OM or jumbo with different wood(s) than my D-03R.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: SolidTopPop on May 24, 2005, 09:47:55 AM
My average age is 24-1/2, which makes my maximum 49.
I play acoustic guitar for myself, and a few other folks. I play an electric bass for the masses.

Scott
Muskegon, MI
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Dr. Evil on May 31, 2005, 12:43:57 PM
39 (40 in a few weeks, ouch) - been playing since I was 13. Started on some cheap classical guitar my parents had and moved into the electric scene real fast. Moved to the acoustic about 15 years ago since the sound was so much better, sharper and simply not overdone. I began to see the real beauty in both the physical guitar and the sound that it produced. Not to mention that I was becoming increasingly disappointed with popular music too.  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: GusHustler on June 01, 2005, 06:40:20 PM
21 and started on an electric at about 14, but couldn't stick with it.  Started playing an acoustic a little over a year ago and am very happy with my progress and whats to come...

I play almost entirely fingerstyle and have an incredible amount of respect for people who can play this style well.  

Acoustics are just a great thing to warm up to and relax with every day.  I consider myself pretty laid back and am not interested in the loud spotlight.  Nothing beats a small group of friends with their wooden boxes, just hanging out enoying each others company.
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: parsky1 on June 01, 2005, 11:12:57 PM
Quote... and have an incredible amount of respect for people who can play this style well.
That makes two of us  B)  
Title: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Fergy07 on June 02, 2005, 09:15:35 AM
Shoot, I just got all bummed when I realized in 9 months I move out of the majority. We're planning on adjusting this for age progression aren't we?

Andy
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: rpg51 on June 17, 2005, 02:50:27 PM
53.
But my son who owns and plays a Larrivee D05 on a daily basis and never touches his Les Paul is 24.
I guess that kinda cancels out.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: rrgguitarman on June 18, 2005, 09:45:07 PM
Pushing 53. Picked up the electric at 10 played in a couple of rock bands and as i've gotten older I find myself picking up my acoustic more and more...I can't remember when I last played my strat.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: drathbun on June 21, 2005, 11:38:19 PM
Quote from: Dan1954 on May 10, 2005, 09:01:45 AM
I'm 50

I'm not! ... yet ...
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dreamsinger on June 22, 2005, 12:15:27 AM
I'm 52, my earliest memory of playing is on a uke I got for my 5th birthday. My mom says she threw cheap plastic stringed things in my crib from birth. First paid electric gig at 12, first acoustic gig at 13. Twiddled my thumbs in a dozen odd bands but being a victim of the Great Folk Scare of the 60's I found my greatest affinity was for acoustic.  Played bass because it was good money and easy gigs but really preferred the solo acoustic gigs. Dropped out of Berklee as a bassist (good enough to get in, not good enough to thrive).  Still enjoy playing bass on the rare occasions I can hook up with a good blues or jazz band.  Didn't play electric 6 string again until a few years back when I realized that Mark Knopfler and Jeff Beck fingerpick their Strats, giving me permission to persue my electric chops. I can't flatpick worth a crap.  Learned much of what I know about luthiery from Bob Benedetto and Augie LoPrinzi. Might have persued it as a career had I thought I had a snowball's chance of being anywhere near as good at it them. Worked in music retail in high school and have the dubious distiction of throwing Paul Reed Smith out of the store for asking too many(what seemed at the time) stupid questions.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Ed R. on June 22, 2005, 08:40:37 PM
I'm 45... started out electric, worked up to Les Pauls and a HiWatt Stack, long hair, that was the stuff...  working a lot, kids, too much noise in life made me appreciate the gentle call of the acoustic... also, no lugging equipment, just plop down and play...  joy.     hummmm...  short hair, lots of gray, connection?   maybe...
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: btbill on June 23, 2005, 08:05:13 AM
49, have hair... grey, also have a few extra lbs.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dreamsinger on June 23, 2005, 09:41:55 AM
Quote from: btbill on June 23, 2005, 08:05:13 AM
49, have hair... grey, also have a few extra lbs.

Count your blessings in that it's only a *few*.  I went past that long ago.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Randy_R on June 23, 2005, 09:50:15 AM
I want to put together a Led Zepplin retro band to help me work off a few pounds..  :mellow:
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: egordon99 on June 24, 2005, 02:12:59 PM
I'm 28, although when I was in HS in the 1990s, my parents said I should have been around in the 1960s, as I listened to alot of classic rock. I started out playing electric (Fender Strat  :wacko:) in Junior High and HS, but got my first real acoustic (Martin D16H) when I was a sophmore in HS. I grew more drawn towards acoustic music as I progressed through HS and college, eventually selling off my electric/amps/etc when I was a Junior in College (~1997/98), and I've been 100% unplugged since then!  :GRN>
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: btbill on June 25, 2005, 02:25:10 PM
Quote from: dreamsinger on June 23, 2005, 09:41:55 AM
Quote from: btbill on June 23, 2005, 08:05:13 AM
49, have hair... grey, also have a few extra lbs.

Count your blessings in that it's only a *few*.  I went past that long ago.
That's the main reason I had to get the Jumbo, I thought that it would make this old guy look skinny, :WNK>
It didn't work!! I posted the pic at "J-10 concerns", if you need a laugh, besides being over weight I look hung-over, and I don't even drink!! Life is rough!
btbill
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dreamsinger on June 25, 2005, 02:28:55 PM
Quote from: btbill on June 25, 2005, 02:25:10 PM
Quote from: dreamsinger on June 23, 2005, 09:41:55 AM
Quote from: btbill on June 23, 2005, 08:05:13 AM
49, have hair... grey, also have a few extra lbs.

Count your blessings in that it's only a *few*.  I went past that long ago.
That's the main reason I had to get the Jumbo, I thought that it would make this old guy look skinny, :WNK>
It didn't work!! I posted the pic at "J-10 concerns", if you need a laugh, besides being over weight I look hung-over, and I don't even drink!! Life is rough!
btbill

295#, size 14 gloves and my next guitar is a 00. This could begin to resemble that circus stunt where an apparent never ending  parade of clowns exits the VW.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dbirchett on June 25, 2005, 07:17:34 PM
Quote from: dreamsinger on June 25, 2005, 02:28:55 PM
295#, size 14 gloves and my next guitar is a 00. This could begin to resemble that circus stunt where an apparent never ending  parade of clowns exits the VW.

Sort of like this?  :WNK>

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v497/dbirchett/DoyleDykesMe.jpg)
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dreamsinger on June 25, 2005, 07:55:47 PM
Quote from: dbirchett on June 25, 2005, 07:17:34 PM
Quote from: dreamsinger on June 25, 2005, 02:28:55 PM
295#, size 14 gloves and my next guitar is a 00. This could begin to resemble that circus stunt where an apparent never ending  parade of clowns exits the VW.

Sort of like this?  :WNK>

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v497/dbirchett/DoyleDykesMe.jpg)

That is the smallest 614CE I've ever seen!
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: btbill on June 25, 2005, 08:45:33 PM
You may have me beat, in this photo I am around 270. I was really hoping that the Jumbo would slim me down!! :WNK>

[attachment no longer available]
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: dbirchett on June 26, 2005, 01:14:35 AM
Quote from: dreamsinger on June 25, 2005, 07:55:47 PM

That is the smallest 614CE I've ever seen!

Actually, its a DDSM but in my hands it looks like a parlor.
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: el guitana on June 26, 2005, 08:58:30 PM
Smack dab in the majority at 48. Got my first, a 3rd hand Kay archtop with fake "flame" painted into the sunburst, at age 13. Been semi-serious about playing a lot since about 18. Even during my rock band days, I used to want to go acoustic, but the boys thought that was lame.  Now one of them is my acoustic duo partner!
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: jambrose on July 12, 2005, 09:32:18 AM
Quote from: wyodeb on May 10, 2005, 11:50:49 AM
42. Not bald. :lol:

Deb

This gave me a good laugh!

Tx Deb
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: sologuitar on July 12, 2005, 03:05:34 PM
There is a large population of older acoustic players, and I think there are several reasons for it. The baby boomers, who started playing back in the 1960's, are aging now. But they love their guitars. Many people have more time on their hands. Maybe they're retired or the kids have grown up. I know a lot of people who started playing the guitar in their 50's and 60's. They have the money to take lessons and the time to practice.

Another reason is the availability of high-quality guitars today. You can get better guitars for less money. Anybody who wants a nice guitar can have one. You can get a used Larrivee parlor for $500. Back in the 60's we didn't have those options. CNC machines and laser cutters didn't exist. Jean Larrivee in those days was hand-building classical guitars at home.

I started playing 40 years ago. Today I'm playing better and enjoying it more than ever. I think experience and maturity improve guitar playing in ways that are difficult to describe. Segovia knew that. He often said that guitarists should not attempt to play the famous Chaconne until they were at least 50 years old. I know what he meant, and I believe he's right.

Guitar players seem to last a long time. Leo Kottke still tours. He played in my city recently. This Friday I'm going to see John Renbourn. Larry Snitzler, an incredible classical guitarist and Segovia protege, came through town a while back. He sounds as good as ever. All of these guys are in their 60's (at least). And they all perform solo. Those of you who play solo know how hard it is, just you alone against the world, and nobody else to fall back on. If you screw up, there are no excuses.

My bias is obvious, of course. Some will say I like old guitar players because I am one. Whatever the case, I wouldn't have it any other way.

Ashby
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: guitarforlife on July 30, 2005, 04:17:52 AM
started at 14 on electric, mainly because i wanted to be a beatle. i was in a group and borrowed one of my friends electrics. my 1st purchase was an acoustic and i never went back to electric. ended up playing in acoustic duos most of the time, or as a single many times. the odd thing about the age factor is that i am 28, went to bed one night recently and when i woke up i was 56!
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: jazzalta on August 19, 2005, 04:02:02 AM
51, receding hairline, exceeding midline. Started at 15 playing Beatles to Gordon Lightfoot to Joe Pass, with lengthy trips into country, rock and blues. My bliss is now solo guitar instrumentals. 
Title: Re: Are Acoustic Players An Older Lot.
Post by: Tycho on August 19, 2005, 12:57:46 PM
I started on an acoustic at age 12 and quickly moved to electric, so I've almost always had at least one of each around.  However, I started buying lots of electrics in the last 10 years (I'm 48 now), and have only recently been adding to the acoustic collection.

I find that they tend to be more expensive.  -_-