Main Forums => Technical Discussion => Topic started by: Dale_I on October 23, 2009, 04:55:11 PM

Title: Another tonewood article...
Post by: Dale_I on October 23, 2009, 04:55:11 PM
For your reading pleasure, this was originally published in American Lutherie #69 and has been posted online with permission.

http://www.guitarnation.com/articles/calkin.htm
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: Randy_R on October 23, 2009, 05:41:17 PM
I question the premise of the article and a number of statements the author makes.

The concept of tonewood is a hoax. Of the few things that we can do to a guitar and still call it a guitar, changing the wood it is made of will have the least impact upon the quality of the sound that it produces. The tonal difference between a mahogany guitar and a rosewood guitar is exactly the same as the difference between two mahogany guitars or two rosewood guitars.

At a gathering of players 4-5 years ago, Tim McKnight brought a set of a dozen pieces of different tone woods, both side woods and top woods. you were blindfolded and then asked to identify which wood was which from a tap test. I was able to get about 7 or 8 of them correctly, which was about average, a few people got them almost/or 100% correct (mostly people who had worked as luthiers or repair people).

I do agree with the statement: The tone of a guitar lies more in the hands of the builder than in the materials from which it is constructed.

Its a good article and worthwhile reading. Thanks for posting.
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: Danny on October 23, 2009, 06:52:05 PM
   I have to disagree from the differences I hear in Maple,hog and RW. At least the ones I have had.
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: hadden on October 23, 2009, 07:14:49 PM
Like a chef saying there is not much difference between sugar and salt. Some chef.
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: Danny on October 23, 2009, 08:13:58 PM
Quote from: hadden on October 23, 2009, 07:14:49 PM
Like a chef saying there is not much difference between sugar and salt. Some chef.
Or cinnamon and peppermint.
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: dmcginnis on October 23, 2009, 08:54:13 PM
Thanks for the disgreements - I find significant differences between tone woods.  Both the soundboard and back/side woods **do** make a difference, as does the bracing pattern. Otherwise, all guitars would sound the same...and they do not.

Dave
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: Dale_I on October 23, 2009, 09:15:00 PM
I disagree with statements made in the article, and agree with others. However, I thought I might offer it up since I found it.

Remember... don't shoot the messenger!!!
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: unclrob on October 23, 2009, 09:50:27 PM
Ya don't shoot......................................Throw donuts at him......................................................... :donut2 :donut2 :donut2 :donut2 :donut :donut :donut :donut :donut2 :donut2 :donut2


















:wave
Title: Re: Another tonewood article...
Post by: Bubblemaker on October 25, 2009, 08:12:13 PM
Sorry ...but all tonewoods each have a distinct tonal influence.  In fact every " Solid " has a very distinct analogue frequency.   That coupled with its molecular and physical density allows each to project a very distinct tone.

I must disagree 150% with the statement in this article!


Cheers!


Bubblemaker!