Got bored and took some pictures. Does anybody know if there are any construction differences between an OM-03 MQ and an OM-05 Mahogany? The OM-03 MQ seems to have all the upgrades the 05 has over the 03--does anybody know of anything an 05 has over it?
(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t140/matrim604/OM-03MQ1.jpg)
(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t140/matrim604/OM-03MQ2.jpg)
(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t140/matrim604/OM-03MQ3.jpg)
(http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t140/matrim604/OM-03MQ4.jpg)
gloss
Looks like your OM-03 doesn't have the silver around the headstock like the 05 does. Also the nut, saddle and pins are different maybe?
:niceguitar: :thumbsup
Your OM 03 MQ is a satin finish, not gloss like the 05, and has the satin headstock without the sterling silver inlay. Nice abalone rosette as well. That being said, you have one beautiful guitar. My son has the same model, and while I generally like the gloss finish, that 03 MQ is a beautiful example of Larrivee's work, and the wood binding really compliments the overall appearance. Not to mention that this is one sweet sounding guitar.
I thought that these MQs were part of a limited issue that were built for the 12th Fret in Toronto last year, but I see that you are in Vancouver. Where did you find this gem? While I was admiring my son's OM 03 MQ on the weekend, I was thinking that this is one guitar that you just do not sell or trade - EVER!!!
:niceguitar:
jimmy
Wow, that's a gorgeous guitar!
I've got a plain jane OM-03 that I love dearly.. I bet you're lovin' yours.
Along with what's been mentioned so far.. I think your 03 may be missing the tiny strip of purfling between the binding and the sides that the 05 and up have. Oh, and also the purfling material around the bottom wedge piece.
-dan
It's hard to tell in the pictures, but I think you have the white -03 headstock logo instead of MOP. The binding also looks like plain maple. My only -05 has highly flamed maple binding, while my -03's have plain maple. I suspect flamed maple binding might clash with that beautiful quilted mahogany anyway. Very nice :thumb :drool:
:niceguitar: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :niceguitar:
I bet it sound s even better than it looks too!!!
Congrats Matrim604. Looks like you've got a winner.
:niceguitar: :drool: :SHK>
Man I'm in love!!!! everyone knows I'm :cheers a sucker for mahogany...and that is just fantastic.....Congrats. I'm saving those pics to my drool file!!! :arrow
:cheers
Blue
Quote from: jimmy buffett on January 31, 2007, 10:20:18 PM
Your OM 03 MQ is a satin finish, not gloss like the 05, and has the satin headstock without the sterling silver inlay. Nice abalone rosette as well. That being said, you have one beautiful guitar. My son has the same model, and while I generally like the gloss finish, that 03 MQ is a beautiful example of Larrivee's work, and the wood binding really compliments the overall appearance. Not to mention that this is one sweet sounding guitar.
I thought that these MQs were part of a limited issue that were built for the 12th Fret in Toronto last year, but I see that you are in Vancouver. Where did you find this gem? While I was admiring my son's OM 03 MQ on the weekend, I was thinking that this is one guitar that you just do not sell or trade - EVER!!!
Tom Lee Music in Vancouver had some of them for sale as well. And thanks for the comments. I do love this guitar--I enjoy admiring the workmanship almost as much as I enjoy playing it :) It sounded great when I first picked it up, but recently I can really hear it starting to warm up or mellow out. This is my first Larrivee, and my first acoustic for that matter (use to only play electric) and I must say I am extremely impressed with the guitar. the only problem is that I already want another one :) I'm come so close to forking out the money for different models with different tonewoods :crying: So far i've managed to hold off though... So far...
P.S. Does anybody else have any pictures of your OM-03 MQs? I've seen three of them here in Vancouver, and all three of them looked very different from each other. I'm curious to see what other MQs look like if anybody has pics.
Quote from: Matrim604 on February 02, 2007, 03:36:13 AM
P.S. Does anybody else have any pictures of your OM-03 MQs? I've seen three of them here in Vancouver, and all three of them looked very different from each other. I'm curious to see what other MQs look like if anybody has pics.
I purchased one of 50 Limited Edition L 05 Custom MQ guitars from Long & McQuade. Mine is #37, and I have personally seen #7 and #36, and not only do they look different from eachother, I am pleased to say that the most impressive wood set on these quilted mohoganys is #37!
IMHO... :bgrin:
jimmy
Quote from: jimmy buffett on February 04, 2007, 09:02:02 PM
I purchased one of 50 Limited Edition L 05 Custom MQ guitars from Long & McQuade. Mine is #37, and I have personally seen #7 and #36, and not only do they look different from eachother, I am pleased to say that the most impressive wood set on these quilted mohoganys is #37!
IMHO... :bgrin:
jimmy
Have a picture?
I have recently become the proud owner of the same beautiful model. It is, by far, the nicest acoustic I have ever had the pleasure to play. It came set up pretty well, just lowered the action slightly to make it a dream. Sure hope you enjoy yours as much as I do. This is my first posting so CHEERS! :donut :donut :donut :coffee
I am contemplating trading for an OM-03 MQ as I type. I am sure I will like the Larrivee, but I'd be trading 2 very nice all solid guitars to get it. Normally I wouldn't consider doing this for a "3" series Larry, but these look to be very special in a few ways. I don't think there will be many more like it and Mahogany gets more elusive each day. I just hope the guitar does not sound "boxy".
I recieved my OM-03 MQ from Guitaradoptions. They are a beutiful guitar and I love the sound of mine. My Larrivee inlay looks like MOP too me. This is the first "highend" guitar I have owned and I can't imagine other guitars sounding much better. :guitar