Marketplace => For Sale => Topic started by: lestrouble on July 03, 2006, 12:49:08 AM

Title: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: lestrouble on July 03, 2006, 12:49:08 AM

well i found this guitar in ebay just want to see what is other opinion.... :GRN> :WNK>

http://cgi.ebay.com/Custom-Museum-Abalone-Pearl-Guitar-with-H-S-Case_W0QQitemZ260003753167QQihZ016QQcategoryZ2385QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: roknroll on July 03, 2006, 12:55:06 AM
where's the emo icon that represents puking?
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: davidsowk on July 03, 2006, 01:00:31 AM
I have seen this type of thing before and always wondered if the guitar is actually playable!  All that inlay might be a tone killer.
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: didymus21 on July 03, 2006, 03:01:37 AM
When he says Tony's workshop, he must be referring to Antonio Tsai's shop.  Lot's of inlay on a cheapely built guitars that often frequent ebay.

http://stores.ebay.com/Antoniotsais-Guitar-Mandolin-Arts

They are often referred to as "museum" quality peices.  I have to admit, a lot of his pickguards and tuning pegs are pretty cool looking; along with the fretboard inlays.  Not a big fan of all the body stuff. 
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: btdvox on July 03, 2006, 03:32:41 AM
all that inlay may be tone killer? look at the cracks and what the ad says! Major FLAW! and plus it is damn ugly. Who would take that on stage? and if they did would you think its nice?... uh uh. its almost as bad as taht 100000$ martin. eww
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: ronmac on July 03, 2006, 08:08:10 AM
I don't know why, but every time I see one of those guitars I think of Porter Wagner.

(http://www.countrymusic.com.au/cmstore/Tours/2000/PorterWagonerOpry.jpg)

(http://www.tapecircle.co.uk/spydaradio/Nashville05/25March_PorterWagoner02.jpg)

(http://a3.cpimg.com/image/A5/1E/834213-5569-020001BF-.jpg)
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: Ratishna on July 03, 2006, 08:21:59 AM
Dressed out guitars used to be known as 'cowboy' guitars because they were often used by flamboyant artists in the country music field.  But it comes down to this: some people like unadorned guitars, plain and simple.  For others, no amount of inlay is too much.  For most, there is middle ground.

E. Shoaf
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: whiskeyjack on July 03, 2006, 10:22:34 AM
I just have to wonder what those things sound like.  THey're 'pretty' enough to look at but I'd be afraid to be seen playing one - - - - someone might confuse me with a star and expect me to play something they can sing along with. ^_^ ^_^ ^_^ ^_^      Only Dolly Parton could upstage one of those things.  :GRN> :huh:  Well. . .maybe not.
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: Ratishna on July 03, 2006, 10:28:56 AM
Guitar as art?  Not every piece of artwork is a Monet.  Maybe a Picasso?

E. Shoaf
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: lestrouble on July 03, 2006, 10:58:52 AM
more is less, less is more ...... :TON>
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: Cowgirlie on July 03, 2006, 11:52:03 AM
Well, it certainly is an interesting study in inlay, anyway. I think it's kind of ugly, but I would stop to study it, and marvel at the inlay. The designs don't seem to have any kind of flow, they are just "ornate"

Like his clothes or not, and like him or not ( I don't) Porter Waggoner wears designs by Manuel of Nashville (a former Nudie's designer) and if you study the floral designs Porter wears, they are beautifully designed to follow the lines of wearer and the cut of the clothes...fortunately, Porter does not design his own, or they would look like that guitar.  :rolleyes:

Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: dcarey on July 03, 2006, 02:24:06 PM
Too far over the top for me.
It's just butt ugly.

Dan
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: DVGuy on July 03, 2006, 03:00:52 PM
The only thing uglier is a Martn D-100, but this one is probably going to go for a lot less. ^_^
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: danijoe on July 03, 2006, 05:20:01 PM
As they say, "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder". This beholder thinks it's OTT. UGLY!!!
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: Jackwr on July 03, 2006, 05:44:18 PM
"0" bids says it all
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: wyodeb on July 03, 2006, 09:55:58 PM
Ugh! Maybe that's why mine are 03s. I don't mind a little abalone (I thought it was beautiful on the L-05 MT), but that's ridiculous!

Deb
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: jimmyd on July 03, 2006, 11:40:58 PM
I'm with deb. I don't even like dot markers on the fretboard face. I'd rather have one painted by Peter Cree then haul around all that dead shellfish if I wanted art on my guitar. 
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: Calvin on July 04, 2006, 04:41:45 AM
I dont know if it's ugly.  I mean it's not my cup of tea.  Kind of like having 8 projector headlights for a luxury limo (sure it's overboard, but hey why not?).  I mean it's certainly impressive for sure.

I dont know, personally I'd rather have an OMV-03R that I can play to the ground.   Or for my nicer guitars maybe a 5 or 9 series kind of guitar.  That's just me though.
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: rustychicken on July 04, 2006, 08:30:31 PM
not my cup of cow juice either. i say if ain't Baroque, don't fix it.
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: Fstpicker on July 05, 2006, 12:04:45 AM
Well, I don't know about "museum" piece, but it sure has been a "conversation" piece here!! :rolleyes:

Jeff
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: dbirchett on July 05, 2006, 11:36:47 AM
Normally, I like a fair amount of bling but this one just kind of leaves me cold.  :huh:

Sorry to anyone who does like it but it does absolutely nothing for me!
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: bigmo on July 05, 2006, 08:40:00 PM
I personally find it as ugly and useless as this   :SHK>  A real tone enhancer.

(http://www.guitarcovers.com/images/d2890beautyshot2.jpg)
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: wyodeb on July 05, 2006, 09:36:59 PM
Quote from: bigmo on July 05, 2006, 08:40:00 PM
I personally find it as ugly and useless as this   :SHK>  A real tone enhancer.

Wow – a guitar mute!

Deb
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: lestrouble on July 06, 2006, 06:35:52 AM
looks like a mask to me...... ^_^ ^_^
Title: Re: true beauty or plain ugly??
Post by: HangFire on July 08, 2006, 02:20:54 PM
I think these guys started the whole thing back in the 30's and 40's!

(http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/P/B0000001KU.01._AA240_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg)

They are awesome! :ph34r: